Commentary on Lack of comprehension of common prostate cancer terms in an underserved population: Kilbridge KL, Fraser G, Krahn M, Nelson EM, Conaway M, Bashore R, Wolf A, Barry MJ, Gong DA, Nease RF Jr., Connors AF, Massachusetts General Hospital, Genera

To assess the comprehension of common medical terms used in prostate cancer in patient education materials to obtain informed consent, and to measure outcomes after prostate cancer treatment. We address this issue among underserved African-American men because of the increased cancer incidence and mortality observed in this population. iewed patient education materials and prostate-specific quality-of-life instruments to identify technical terms describing sexual, urinary, and bowel function. Understanding of these terms was assessed in face-to-face interviews of 105, mostly African-American men, age ≥ 40, from two low-income clinics. Comprehension was evaluated using semiqualitative methods coded by two independent investigators. Demographics were collected and literacy was measured. than 50% of patients understood the terms “erection” or “impotent.” Only 5% of patients understood the term “incontinence” and 25% understood the term “bowel habits.” More patients recognized word roots than related terms or compound words (e.g., “rectum” vs. “rectal urgency,” “intercourse” vs. “vaginal intercourse”). Comprehension of terms from all domains was significantly correlated statistically with reading level (P < 0.001). Median literacy level was fourth to sixth grade. Prostate cancer knowledge was poor. Many patients had difficulty locating key anatomic structures. d comprehension of prostate cancer terms and low literacy create barriers to obtaining informed consent for treatment and to measuring prostate cancer outcomes accurately in our study population. In addition, the level of prostate cancer knowledge was poor. These results highlight the need for prostate cancer education efforts and outcomes measurements that consider literacy and use nonmedical language.