Title of article :
Immediate results and late clinical outcomes after new crossflex coronary stent implantation
Author/Authors :
Park، نويسنده , , Seung-Jung and Park، نويسنده , , Seong-Wook and Lee، نويسنده , , Cheol Whan and Hong، نويسنده , , Myeong-Ki and Kim، نويسنده , , Jae-Joong and Park، نويسنده , , Hoon-Ki and Hong، نويسنده , , Mun K and Mintz، نويسنده , , Gary S. and Leon MD، نويسنده , , Martin B، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
Abstract :
This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the new CrossFlex stent in the treatment of native coronary artery disease. The CrossFlex stent is a flexible, balloon-expandable new device with an excellent flexibility, radial strength, conformability, and radio-opacity. Little data are available concerning the clinical and angiographic outcomes of this device. The CrossFlex stent was implanted in 209 consecutive patients with 226 lesions. Follow-up angiography was performed at 6 months, and clinical evaluation was undertaken at regular intervals after stent implantation. Procedural success was achieved in all lesions without in-hospital complications. Angiographic follow-up data were available in 153 of the 187 eligible lesions (follow-up rate, 82%), and the overall angiographic restenosis rate was 16.3%. Minimal lumen diameter immediately after stent placement was the only predictor of angiographic restenosis. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at 10.5 ± 5.2 months. There were 4 deaths (1 cardiac in origin, the others noncardiac in origin), and 1 nonfatal myocardial infarction (nonstented artery) during follow-up. Target lesion revascularization was required in 15 patients (7%), and the overall event-free survival rate (death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization) was 87% at the end of the follow-up period. The CrossFlex stent is a safe and effective device with a high procedural success rate, and a favorable late clinical outcome for treatment of native coronary artery disease. Further randomized trials are needed to compare the CrossFlex stent with standard slotted-tube stents.
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology