Author/Authors :
Costa، نويسنده , , Marco A and Sabate، نويسنده , , Manel and Kay، نويسنده , , I.Patrick and de Feyter، نويسنده , , Pim J and Kozuma، نويسنده , , Ken and Serrano، نويسنده , , Pedro and de Valk، نويسنده , , Vincent and Albertal، نويسنده , , Mariano and Ligthart، نويسنده , , Jurgen M.R and Disco، نويسنده , , Clemens and Foley، نويسنده , , David P and Serruys، نويسنده , , Patrick W، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Currently, several different designs of coronary stents are available. However, only a few of the new generation stents have been investigated in large randomized trials. Mechanical behavior of first-generation stents (Palmaz-Schatz, Gianturco-Roubin) may not be applied to the new designs. We investigated the chronic mechanical behavior (recoil) of 2 stents recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (MULTILINK and NIR). Forty-eight patients with single-stent implantation (23 MULTILINK and 25 NIR) were assessed by means of volumetric 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound analysis after the procedure and at 6-month follow-up. In addition, volumetric assessment of neointimal formation was performed. No significant chronic stent recoil was detected in both groups (Δ MULTILINK stent volume: +5.6 ± 41 mm3 [p = NS] and Δ NIR stent volume + 2.1 ± 26 mm3 [p = NS]). A similar degree of neointimal formation at 6 months was observed between the 2 stents (MULTILINK 46 ± 31.9 mm3 vs NIR 39.9 ± 27.6 mm3, p = NS). In conclusion, these 2 second-generation tubular stents did not show chronic recoil and appeared to promote similar proliferative response after implantation in human coronary arteries.