Title of article :
Stenting the stent: initial results and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of coronary stenting for patients with in-stent restenosis
Author/Authors :
Alfonso، نويسنده , , Fernando and Cequier، نويسنده , , Angel and Zueco، نويسنده , , Javier and Mor??s، نويسنده , , César and Su?rez، نويسنده , , Concepci?n P and Colman، نويسنده , , Thierry and Esplugas، نويسنده , , Enrique and Pérez-Vizcayno، نويسنده , , Mar??a J and Fern?ndez، نويسنده , , Cristina and Macaya، نويسنده , , Carlos، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Pages :
6
From page :
327
To page :
332
Abstract :
Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge affecting an increasing number of patients. Conventional angioplasty and debulking techniques are currently used in these patients. However, the potential role of a second stent implantation in this setting (stenting the stent) remains unknown. Therefore, 65 consecutive patients (12 women, aged 62 ± 11 years) undergoing stent implantation (42 elective and 23 unplanned) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (diffuse [>10 mm] in 39 [60%]) were studied. Angiographic success was obtained in all patients. Three patients developed hospital complications: 1 died from refractory heart failure and 2 suffered non–Q-wave myocardial infarctions. During follow-up (mean 17 ± 11 months) 1 patient died (noncardiac cause) and only 9 (14%) required target vessel revascularization. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) at 1 year was 84%. Using Cox analysis, patients with unstable symptoms, a short time to stent restenosis, nonelective stenting, and B2-C lesions tended to have poorer prognosis. After adjustment, nonelective stenting was associated (adjusted RR 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 10.3, p = 0.09) with an adverse clinical outcome. On quantitative angiography (core lab) restenosis was found in 13 of 43 patients (30%) (75% of those eligible). Logistic regression analysis identify restenosis length (adjusted RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.14, p = 0.04), and time to restenosis (adjusted RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94, p = 0.01) as the only independent predictors of recurrent restenosis. Thus, repeat coronary stenting is a safe and efficacious strategy for the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis. Both elective and nonelective stenting provide excellent initial results. The long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of these patients is also favorable.
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year :
2000
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number :
1891759
Link To Document :
بازگشت