Title of article :
Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of edge recurrence after intracoronary gamma radiation treatment of native artery in-stent restenosis lesions
Author/Authors :
Ahmed، نويسنده , , Javed M and Mintz، نويسنده , , Gary S and Waksman، نويسنده , , Ron and Lansky، نويسنده , , Alexandra J. and Mehran، نويسنده , , Roxana and Wu، نويسنده , , Hongsheng and Weissman، نويسنده , , Neil J and Pichard، نويسنده , , Augusto D and Satler، نويسنده , , Lowell F and Kent، نويسنده , , Kenneth M and Leon، نويسنده , , Martin B، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Pages :
5
From page :
1145
To page :
1149
Abstract :
In the Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial (WRIST), patients were first treated with conventional techniques and then randomized to either γ-irradiation (192Ir) or placebo (dummy seeds). In the 192Ir group with native coronary in-stent restenosis, we identified 8 patients with edge recurrence and compared them with 21 patients with no recurrence. Serial (postirradiation and follow-up) intravascular ultrasound analysis was performed according to conventional methods. When compared with nonrecurring lesions, lesions with distal edge recurrence had (1) greater decrease in mean distal lumen cross-sectional area (−3.0 ± 1.2 vs −0.7 ± 1.0 mm2, p = 0.0002), (2) no change in mean distal external elastic membrane cross-sectional area versus an increase in mean distal cross-sectional area of 1.0 ± 0.9 mm2 in nonrecurring lesions (p = 0.0047), and (3) a greater increase in mean distal plaque + media cross-sectional area (2.9 ± 1.2 mm vs 1.7 ± 0.6 mm2, p = 0.0103). Within the stented segment, the nonrecurring lesions had no decrease in mean lumen and no increase in mean intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area. Conversely, lesions with distal edge recurrence had a significant decrease in mean intrastent lumen cross-sectional area (−1.7 ± 1.7 mm2) and a significant increase in mean intrastent intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area (1.6 ± 1.6 mm2). Lesions with distal edge recurrence also had a greater decrease in mean proximal lumen cross-sectional area (−1.7 ± 1.3 vs −0.3 ± 0.8 mm2, p = 0.0213), with a trend toward a greater increase in mean proximal plaque + media cross-sectional area. Thus, edge recurrence after 192Ir treatment of in-stent restenosis is the result of neointimal hyperplasia (part of generalized treatment failure) and the absence of radiation-induced positive remodeling.
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year :
2001
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number :
1892765
Link To Document :
بازگشت