Author/Authors :
Ashby، نويسنده , , Dale T. and Aymong، نويسنده , , Eve A. and Grines، نويسنده , , Cindy L. and Cox، نويسنده , , David A. and Garcia، نويسنده , , Eulogio and Mehran، نويسنده , , Roxana and Tcheng، نويسنده , , James E. and Griffin، نويسنده , , John J. and Guagliumi، نويسنده , , Giulio and Stuckey، نويسنده , , Thomas L. Carroll، نويسنده , , John D. and Turco، نويسنده , , Mark and Lansky، نويسنده , , Alexandra ، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
The results of bail-out stenting after unsuccessful primary balloon angioplasty compared with routine stenting or successful balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction are unknown. In the CADILLAC trial, 168 of 1,044 patients (16.1%) randomized to balloon angioplasty crossed over to stenting after unsuccessful dilatation. Event-free survival was similar after bail-out and routine stenting, and was greater than after successful balloon angioplasty.
