Title of article
Risk Factors for Diagnostic Delay in Acute Aortic Dissection
Author/Authors
Rapezzi، نويسنده , , Claudio and Longhi، نويسنده , , Simone and Graziosi، نويسنده , , Maddalena and Biagini، نويسنده , , Elena and Terzi، نويسنده , , Francesca and Cooke، نويسنده , , Robin M.T. and Quarta، نويسنده , , Cristina and Sangiorgi، نويسنده , , Diego and Ciliberti، نويسنده , , Paolo and Di Pasquale، نويسنده , , Giuseppe and Branzi، نويسنده , , Angelo، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Pages
8
From page
1399
To page
1406
Abstract
In acute aortic dissection (AAD), timely diagnosis is challenging. However, dedicated studies of the entity and determinants of delay are currently lacking. We surveyed pre-/in-hospital time to diagnosis and explored risk factors for diagnostic delay. We analyzed the dedicated database of a metropolitan AAD network (161 patients diagnosed since 1996; 115 Stanford type A) in terms of hospital arrival times (from pain to presentation at any hospital) and in-hospital diagnostic times (presentation to final diagnosis). Median (interquartile range) in-hospital diagnostic times were approximately twofold greater than hospital arrival times (177 minutes, 644, vs 75 minutes, 124, p = 0.0001, Wilcoxon test). Median annual in-hospital diagnostic times were most often ∼3 hours (spread was wide, but decreased after 2001; ρ = −0.94, p = 0.005). Risk factors (univariate analysis) for in-hospital diagnostic time >75th percentile (12 hours) included pleural effusion (odds ratio 3.96, 95% confidence interval 1.80 to 8.69), dyspneic presentation (odds ratio 3.33, 95% confidence interval 1.93 to 8.59), and age <70 years (odds ratio 2.34, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 5.36). Systolic arterial pressure ≤105 mm Hg decreased the likelihood of lengthy diagnosis (odds ratio 0.08, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.59). In patients (n = 82) with routine values (since 2000), troponin positivity (odds ratio 3.63, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 11.84) and an acute coronary syndrome–like electrocardiogram (odds ratio 2.88, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 8.17) were also risk factors. In conclusion, in a metropolitan setting, most of the diagnostic delay may occur in hospital. At presentation, pleural effusion, troponin positivity, acute coronary syndrome–like electrocardiogram, and dyspnea are possible “clinical confounders” associated with particularly long in-hospital diagnostic times.
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year
2008
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number
1897054
Link To Document