Title of article :
Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy Randomized to Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin Versus Aspirin Alone (A post hoc Analysis of the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance [CHARISMA] Tri
Author/Authors :
Dasgupta، نويسنده , , Arijit and Steinhubl، نويسنده , , Steven R. and Bhatt، نويسنده , , Deepak L. and Berger، نويسنده , , Peter B. and Shao، نويسنده , , Mingyuan and Mak، نويسنده , , Koon-Hou and Fox، نويسنده , , Keith A.A. and Montalescot، نويسنده , , Gilles and Weber، نويسنده , , Michael A. and Haffner، نويسنده , , Steven M. and Dimas، نويسنده , , Alexios P. and Steg، نويسنده , , P. Gabriel an، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Abstract :
No prospective randomized trial has specifically examined the long-term outcomes of clopidogrel use in patients with chronic kidney disease. This study aimed to determine the risks and benefits of long-term clopidogrel administration in patients with diabetic nephropathy, the most common form of chronic kidney disease. We performed a post hoc analysis of the CHARISMA trial, which randomly assigned patients without active acute coronary syndrome, but with established atherosclerotic disease (symptomatic) or multiple risk factors for atherosclerotic disease (asymptomatic), to clopidogrel plus aspirin versus placebo plus aspirin. All CHARISMA patients (n = 15,603) were separated into the 3 groups: nondiabetic patients, diabetic patients without nephropathy, and diabetic patients with nephropathy. Within each group, outcomes of patients randomly assigned to clopidogrel were compared with those of patients randomly assigned to placebo. Outcomes in the prespecified CHARISMA subgroups of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were also compared with respect to study drug assignment and nephropathy status. Patients with nephropathy who received clopidogrel had no difference in bleeding, but experienced significantly increased cardiovascular (CV) and overall mortality compared with those randomly assigned to placebo. There were no differences in bleeding, overall mortality, or CV mortality for nondiabetic or diabetic patients without nephropathy who received clopidogrel versus placebo. In the asymptomatic cohort, patients with nephropathy randomly assigned to clopidogrel had significantly increased overall and CV mortality compared with placebo, whereas asymptomatic patients without nephropathy randomly assigned to clopidogrel had no significant mortality difference compared with placebo. In conclusion, this post hoc analysis suggested that clopidogrel may be harmful in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Additional studies are needed to investigate this possible interaction.
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology