Title of article :
Angiographic and clinical outcomes associated with direct versus conventional stenting among patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction
Author/Authors :
Ly، نويسنده , , Hung Q. and Kirtane، نويسنده , , Ajay J. and Buros، نويسنده , , Jacki and Giugliano، نويسنده , , Robert P. and Popma، نويسنده , , Jeffrey J. and Antman، نويسنده , , Elliot M. and Harrington، نويسنده , , Robert A. and Ohman، نويسنده , , E. Magnus and Gibson، نويسنده , , C. Michael، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages :
4
From page :
383
To page :
386
Abstract :
The present study reports outcomes of direct stenting versus conventional stenting, which was performed during adjunctive/rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 556) in the Integrilin and Tenecteplase in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial, the Enoxaparin as Adjunctive Antithrombin Therapy for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 23 trial, and the Fibrinolytic and Aggrastat ST-Elevation Resolution trial of fibrinolytic therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Direct stenting was associated with a lower rate of death, myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure during hospitalization and at 30 days and was independently associated with improved in-hospital outcomes (odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.85, p = 0.014).
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year :
2005
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number :
1898717
Link To Document :
بازگشت