Title of article
Comparison of cilostazol and clopidogrel after successful coronary stenting
Author/Authors
Lee، نويسنده , , Seung-Whan and Park، نويسنده , , Seong-Wook and Hong MD، نويسنده , , Myeong-Ki and Lee، نويسنده , , Cheol Whan and Kim، نويسنده , , Young-Hak and Park، نويسنده , , Jae-Hyeong and Kang، نويسنده , , Su Jin and Han، نويسنده , , Ki-Hoon and Kim، نويسنده , , Jae-Joong and Park، نويسنده , , Seung-Jung، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
4
From page
859
To page
862
Abstract
This study compared the safety and efficacy of cilostazol and clopidogrel after coronary stenting. Patients (n = 689) who underwent successful stenting were randomly assigned to receive cilostazol (group 1, n = 344, 612 lesions) or clopidogrel (group 2, n = 345, 628 lesions). The incidence of subacute stent thrombosis or major adverse cardiac events, including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization within 30 days (2.6% in group 1 vs 2.0% in group 2, p = 0.61) and side effects that required cessation of study drug (0.6% each) did not differ statistically between groups. These results indicate that cilostazol is as safe and effective as clopidogrel in preventing thrombotic complications after stenting.
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number
1898984
Link To Document