• Title of article

    Usefulness of T-Wave Loop and QRS Complex Loop to Predict Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction

  • Author/Authors

    Perkiِmنki، نويسنده , , Juha S. and Hyytinen-Oinas، نويسنده , , Miia and Karsikas، نويسنده , , Mari and Seppنnen، نويسنده , , Tapio and Hnatkova، نويسنده , , Katerina and Malik MD، نويسنده , , Marek and Huikuri، نويسنده , , Heikki V.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    353
  • To page
    360
  • Abstract
    The aim of the study was to assess whether parameters based on the T-wave loop and QRS loop predict mortality, and cardiac mortality in particular, during follow-up of consecutive survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients with AMI (n = 437), treated according to contemporary guidelines, underwent digital high-resolution electrocardiography in orthogonal Frank leads (X, Y, Z) 5 to 14 days after AMI. Several T-wave and QRS loop parameters, such as the width and height of the loops and their ratio, T-wave loop dispersion (TWLD), QRS loop dispersion, and co-sine of the angle between the main vectors of the T-wave and QRS loops (TCRT), were calculated using a custom-made software package. During an average follow-up period of 43 ± 14 months, 53 patients (12%) died. Of these 53 deaths, 35 were cardiac. TWLD and TCRT were the T-wave loop/QRS loop parameters that best predicted for cardiac mortality on univariate comparison (35.4 ± 5.62 vs 32.8 ± 2.87 for TWLD, p <0.001 and −0.135 ± 0.665 vs −0.657 ± 0.518 for TCRT, p <0.001, alive vs cardiac death, respectively). After adjustment for clinical risk markers in the Cox regression analysis, TWLD still significantly predicted for cardiac mortality (p <0.05); however, TCRT had lost its predictive power. TWLD did not have significant univariate or multivariate association with noncardiac mortality. In conclusion, TWLD that describes the shape of the T-wave loop is a specific predictor of cardiac death and independent of the clinical risk markers in the current treatment era of patients with AMI.
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Cardiology
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Cardiology
  • Record number

    1900436