Author/Authors :
Agarwal، نويسنده , , Shikhar and Zaman، نويسنده , , Tarique and Tuzcu، نويسنده , , E. Murat and Shishehbor، نويسنده , , Mehdi and Lincoff، نويسنده , , A. Michael and Whitlow، نويسنده , , Patrick L. and Bajzer، نويسنده , , Christopher and Franco، نويسنده , , Irving and Nair، نويسنده , , Ravi and Raymond، نويسنده , , Russell and Ellis، نويسنده , , Stephen G. and Kapadia، نويسنده , , Samir R.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Left main coronary artery (LMCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has emerged as an appealing alternative to bypass surgery for significant LMCA disease, especially in high-risk candidates. PCI for unprotected LMCA stenosis is currently designated a class IIb indication. Direct comparisons between unprotected LMCA PCI and multivessel PCI are lacking. We aimed to determine the incremental risk associated with unprotected LMCA PCI compared to multivessel PCI. We queried the Cleveland Clinic PCI database to identify patients who underwent unprotected LMCA PCI from 2003 through 2009 and compared these to patients undergoing multivessel PCI in the same period. Patients undergoing PCI for acute myocardial infarction were excluded. Mortality was derived using the Social Security Death Index. Short-term (≤30-day) mortality rates in the LMCA PCI group (n = 468, 1.9%) were similar to the death rate in the multivessel PCI group (n = 1,973, 1.3%, p = 0.3). There was no significant difference in adjusted mortality between the 2 study groups. Stratifying LMCA PCI by the number of concomitant vessel territories treated, there was no significant difference in mortality in any LMCA PCI category (LMCA only, LMCA + 1-vessel PCI, LMCA + multivessel PCI) compared to multivessel PCI. In conclusion, there was comparable short-term and long-term mortality in the LMCA PCI and multivessel PCI groups. LMCA stenting did not appear to incur incremental risk compared to multivessel PCI.
