• Title of article

    Meta-Analysis of Cilostazol Versus Aspirin for the Secondary Prevention of Stroke

  • Author/Authors

    DiNicolantonio، نويسنده , , James J. and Lavie، نويسنده , , Carl J. and Fares، نويسنده , , Hassan and Menezes، نويسنده , , Arthur R. and OʹKeefe، نويسنده , , James H. and Bangalore، نويسنده , , Sripal and Messerli، نويسنده , , Franz H.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    1230
  • To page
    1234
  • Abstract
    Aspirin is the most widely prescribed antiplatelet agent for the secondary prevention of stroke. Cilostazol, an antiplatelet and vasodilating agent, has shown promise for the secondary prevention of stroke. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Excerpta Medica (EMBASE) was searched up to October 2012. Four trials, in 3,917 patients, comparing cilostazol with aspirin were identified. Compared with aspirin, cilostazol was associated with a 73% reduction in hemorrhagic stroke (relative risk [RR] 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13 to 0.54, p = 0.0002), 28% reduction in the composite end point of stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89, p = 0.003), and 48% reduction in total hemorrhagic events (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.79, p = 0.002), with trend for lesser gastrointestinal bleeds (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.06, p = 0.08). In conclusion, compared with aspirin, cilostazol is associated with significantly less hemorrhagic stroke, the combined end point of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death, and total hemorrhagic events, with numerically fewer gastrointestinal bleeds when used for the secondary prevention of stroke.
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Cardiology
  • Serial Year
    2013
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Cardiology
  • Record number

    1903763