Title of article
Categorization and action: What about object consistence?
Author/Authors
Anelli، نويسنده , , Filomena and Nicoletti، نويسنده , , Roberto and Borghi، نويسنده , , Anna M.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Pages
9
From page
203
To page
211
Abstract
Categorization studies have focused on the importance of a variety of perceptual properties (shape, size, weight). The present study explored whether the softness or hardness of an object might influence the way we categorize and consider category members. Of additional interest was whether information on consistence is automatically activated and whether it is modulated by the kind of task and of response modality. Three experiments demonstrated that information on consistence is automatically activated, and it helps us to distinguish between artefacts and natural objects. Interestingly, the results are in agreement with the simulation hypothesis; namely, when we consider artefacts, we simulate using them and information on their consistence is activated; this simulation is modulated by the task. The way we differently process artefacts and natural objects across the experiments confirms the simulation hypothesis and our sensitivity to the response modality.
Keywords
Motor simulation , Categorization , action , Object consistence , Embodied Cognition
Journal title
Acta Psychologica
Serial Year
2010
Journal title
Acta Psychologica
Record number
1904251
Link To Document