Title of article :
Differences in the ability of spermatozoa from individual boar ejaculates to withstand different semen-processing techniques
Author/Authors :
Parrilla، نويسنده , , Inma and del Olmo، نويسنده , , David and Sijses، نويسنده , , Laurien and Martinez-Alborcia، نويسنده , , Marيa J. and Cuello، نويسنده , , Cristina and Vazquez، نويسنده , , Juan M. and Martinez، نويسنده , , Emilio A. and Roca، نويسنده , , Jordi، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages :
8
From page :
66
To page :
73
Abstract :
The present study aimed to evaluate the ability of spermatozoa from individual boar ejaculates to withstand different semen-processing techniques. Eighteen sperm-rich ejaculate samples from six boars (three per boar) were diluted in Beltsville Thawing Solution and split into three aliquots. The aliquots were (1) further diluted to 3 × 107 sperm/mL and stored as a liquid at 17 °C for 72 h, (2) frozen-thawed (FT) at 1 × 109 sperm/mL using standard 0.5-mL straw protocols, or (3) sex-sorted with subsequent liquid storage (at 17 °C for 6 h) or FT (2 × 107 sperm/mL using a standard 0.25-mL straw protocol). The sperm quality was evaluated based on total sperm motility (the CASA system), viability (plasma membrane integrity assessed using flow cytometry and the LIVE/DEAD Sperm Viability Kit), lipid peroxidation (assessed via indirect measurement of the generation of malondialdehyde (MDA) using the BIOXYTECH MDA-586 Assay Kit) and DNA fragmentation (sperm chromatin dispersion assessed using the Sperm-Sus-Halomax ® test). Data were normalized to the values assessed for the fresh (for liquid-stored and FT samples) or the sorted semen samples (for liquid stored and the FT sorted spermatozoa). All of the four sperm-processing techniques affected sperm quality (P < 0.01), regardless of the semen donor, with reduced percentages of motile and viable sperm and increased MDA generation and percentages of sperm with fragmented DNA. Significant (P < 0.05) inter-boar (effect of boars within each semen-processing technique) and intra-boar (effect of semen-processing techniques within each boar) differences were evident for all of the sperm quality parameters assessed, indicating differences in the ability of spermatozoa from individual boars to withstand the semen-processing techniques. These results are the first evidence that ejaculate spermatozoa from individual boars can respond in a boar-dependent manner to different semen-processing techniques.
Keywords :
pig , SEMEN , liquid storage , Cryopreservation , Sex sorting
Journal title :
Animal Reproduction Science
Serial Year :
2012
Journal title :
Animal Reproduction Science
Record number :
1911663
Link To Document :
بازگشت