Author/Authors :
O’Hare، نويسنده , , Michael and Delucchi، نويسنده , , Mark and Edwards، نويسنده , , Robert and Fritsche، نويسنده , , Uwe and Gibbs، نويسنده , , Holly and Hertel، نويسنده , , Thomas and Hill، نويسنده , , Jason and Kammen، نويسنده , , Daniel and Laborde، نويسنده , , David and Marelli، نويسنده , , Luisa and Mulligan، نويسنده , , Declan and Plevin، نويسنده , , Richard and Tyner، نويسنده , , Wallace، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
"Indirect land use change for biofuels: Testing predictions and improving analytical methodologies" by S. Kim and B. Dale [1], presents a principal inference not supported by its results, that rests on a fundamental conceptual error, and that has no place in the current discussion of biofuels’ climate effects. The paper takes correlation between two variables in a system with many interacting factors to indicate (or contraindicate) causation, and draws a completely incorrect inference from observed sample statistics and their significance levels.
Keywords :
Indirect land use change , biofuels , GLOBAL WARMING , agricultural markets , Corn ethanol