Author/Authors :
Nolan، نويسنده , , Tereza and Troy، نويسنده , , Shane M. and Gilkinson، نويسنده , , Stephen J. Frost، نويسنده , , Peter and Xie، نويسنده , , Sihuang and Zhan، نويسنده , , Xinmin and Harrington، نويسنده , , Caolan and Healy، نويسنده , , Mark G. and Lawlor، نويسنده , , Peadar G.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
An economic analysis was performed on treatment options for pig manure in Ireland. Costs were based on a 500 sow integrated pig farm producing 10,500 m3 of manure per year at 4.8% dry matter. The anaerobic digestion of pig manure and grass silage (1:1; volatile solids basis) was unviable under the proposed tariffs, with costs at € 5.2 m−3 manure. Subsequent solid–liquid separation of the digestate would cost an additional € 12.8 m−3 manure. The treatment of the separated solid fraction by composting and of the liquid fraction by integrated constructed wetlands, would add € 2.8 and € 4.6 m−3 manure, respectively to the treatment costs. The cost analysis presented showed that the technologies investigated are currently not cost effective in Ireland. Transport and spreading of raw manure, at € 4.9 m−3 manure (15 km maximum distance from farm) is the most cost effective option.
Keywords :
Separation , compost , Anaerobic digestion , Constructed wetlands , spreading