Title of article :
Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects
Author/Authors :
Gerhart، نويسنده , , Barry and Fang، نويسنده , , Meiyu، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages :
12
From page :
41
To page :
52
Abstract :
We address two broad questions: how much pay for individual performance (PFIP) is there and what are the positive and negative effects of PFIP? We consider specific claims, including that PFIP does not motivate (or even de-motivates), that it is ineffective in teams, and that it is ineffective in some national cultures. We demonstrate how incorporating sorting effects of PFIP into conceptual treatments of PFIP can change how one views the likely effectiveness of PFIP across contexts.
Keywords :
Performance , compensation , motivation , Sorting , Incentives , pay for performance
Journal title :
Human Resource Management Review
Serial Year :
2014
Journal title :
Human Resource Management Review
Record number :
1951929
Link To Document :
بازگشت