Title of article :
Is it acceptable for a psychiatrist to break confidentiality to prevent spousal violence?
Author/Authors :
Guedj، نويسنده , , Myriam and Muٌoz Sastre، نويسنده , , Maria Teresa and Mullet، نويسنده , , Etienne and Sorum، نويسنده , , Paul Clay Sorum، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Abstract :
Study question
s it acceptable for a psychiatrist to break confidentiality to protect the wife of a potentially violent patient?
s
y persons, 13 nursing personnel, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists in France indicated this acceptability in 48 scenarios. The scenarios were all combinations of 5 factors: gravity of threat (death or beating), certainty of mental illness (certain or not), time spent talking with patient (considerable or little), his attitude toward psychotherapy (rejection, indecision, or acceptance), and whether the physician consulted an expert.
s
ople favored breaking confidentiality more than did nursing personnel or psychologists. Consulting an expert had greatest impact. Lay participants were composed of groups that found breaking confidentiality “always acceptable” (22 participants), “depending on many circumstances” (106), requiring “consultation with an expert” (31), and “never acceptable” (27).
sion
ople in France are influenced by situational factors when deciding if a psychiatrist should break confidentiality to protect a patientʹs wife.
Keywords :
Patient confidentiality , Spousal abuse , FRANCE , public opinion , Patient–physician relationship , psychiatrist
Journal title :
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Journal title :
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry