Title of article :
Are two interviewers better than one?
Author/Authors :
Fifi?، نويسنده , , Mario and Gigerenzer، نويسنده , , Gerd، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages :
9
From page :
1771
To page :
1779
Abstract :
How many interviewers per job applicant are necessary for a company to achieve the highest hit rate? Are two better than one? Condorcetʹs Jury Theorem and the “wisdom of the crowd” suggest that more is better. Under quite general conditions this study shows, surprisingly, that two interviewers are on average not superior to the best interviewer. Adding further interviewers will also not increase the expected collective hit rate when interviewers are homogeneous (i.e., their hits are nested), only doing so when interviewers are heterogeneous (i.e., their hits are not nested). The current study shows how these results depend on the number of interviewers, their expertise, and the chance of free riding, and specify the conditions when “less is more”. This analysis suggests that the best policy is to invest resources into improving the quality of the best interviewer rather than distribute these to improve the quality of many interviewers.
Keywords :
Wisdom of the crowd , free riding , Less is more , Best interviewer , Interview validity
Journal title :
Journal of Business Research
Serial Year :
2014
Journal title :
Journal of Business Research
Record number :
1956015
Link To Document :
بازگشت