Title of article :
Endorsing Obama licenses favoring Whites
Author/Authors :
Effron، نويسنده , , Daniel A. and Cameron، نويسنده , , Jessica S. and Monin، نويسنده , , Benoît، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Abstract :
Three studies tested whether the opportunity to endorse Barack Obama made individuals subsequently more likely to favor Whites over Blacks. In Study 1, participants were more willing to describe a job as better suited for Whites than for Blacks after expressing support for Obama. Study 2 replicated this effect and ruled out alternative explanations: participants favored Whites for the job after endorsing Obama, but not after endorsing a White Democrat, nor after seeing Obama’s photo without having an opportunity to endorse him. Study 3 demonstrated that racial attitudes moderated this effect: endorsing Obama increased the amount of money allocated to an organization serving Whites at the expense of an organization serving Blacks only for participants high in a measure of racial prejudice. These three studies suggest that expressing support for Obama grants people moral credentials [Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33–43], thus reducing their concern with appearing prejudiced.
Keywords :
licensing , Voting , political psychology , social norms , Moral credentials , racial attitudes
Journal title :
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Journal title :
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology