Title of article :
Resources versus respect: Social judgments based on targetsʹ power and status positions
Author/Authors :
Fragale، نويسنده , , Alison R. and Overbeck، نويسنده , , Jennifer R. and Neale، نويسنده , , Margaret A.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Abstract :
In two experiments, we investigate how individualsʹ levels of power and status interact to determine how they are perceived by others. We find that power and status have similar, positive, effects on judged dominance. We also find that power has a negative effect on perceived warmth, but status moderates this “power penalty”: high power without status is associated with low warmth, but power with status is judged warm. Consequently, we find high status individuals, regardless of power level, are perceived positively – dominant and warm – whereas high power–low status individuals are judged most negatively — dominant and cold (Experiments 1 and 2). As a result, perceivers expect positive interactions with high status individuals, but negative interactions with high power, low status individuals (Experiment 2). These findings provide insight into power and status social judgments, and further our understanding of similarities and differences between these distinct, yet related, constructs.
Keywords :
status , power , dominance , warmth , social judgment
Journal title :
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Journal title :
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology