Author/Authors :
Nozari، Majid نويسنده Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , , Samaei، Mohammad Reza نويسنده Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , , Dehghani، Mansooreh نويسنده Dehghani, Mansooreh
Abstract :
Background: Among Alkanes, N-Alkanes with medium chain
have been identified as the most important contaminants of the
soil. N-hexadecane (C16H34) with low solubility in water also
belongs to this group and has been used by many researchers as
a model contaminant. The present study aimed to investigate the
effect of the external source of carbon (glucose) as co-substrate
on removal of hexadecane from the soil.
Methods: In this study, a Slurry Sequencing Batch Reactor (SSBR)
was used as a pilot by a bacterial consortium, including bacterium
Acinetobacter radioresistens, Bacillus subtilis, and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, in order to remove different concentrations of
hexadecane (1,4,7, and 10 percent).Sampling was performed four
times during the sedimentation step. Then, the samples were
analyzed by GC-FID and the results were analyzed statistically.
Results: The results showed that hexadecane removal (%) by the
microbial consortium was higher in lower initial concentrations
in such a way that the biological removal of hexadecane was
respectively 45.95%, 38.55%, 34.39%, and 32.40% in the
concentrations of 1%, 4%, 7%, and 10% on the third day.
Moreover, adding the external carbon source (glucose) on the
first day caused a 16% increase in hexadecane removal, which
is 1.4 times more than the amount of hexadecane removal in the
conditions without co-metabolism.
Conclusion: The results showed that SSBR could be used as an
exit-situation effective method for hexadecane removal in low
concentrations through considering the effective factors in its
function, such as dissolved oxygen, pH, and temperature. Also,
adding the secondary carbon source could be effective in hexadecane
removal from the soil. Yet, this effect might vary on different days.