Title of article :
Comparison between different types of carboxylmethylcellulose and other oenological additives used for white wine tartaric stabilization
Author/Authors :
Guise، نويسنده , , R. and Filipe-Ribeiro، نويسنده , , L. and Nascimento، نويسنده , , D. and Bessa، نويسنده , , O. and Nunes، نويسنده , , F.M. and Cosme، نويسنده , , F.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages :
8
From page :
250
To page :
257
Abstract :
Carboxylmethylcellulose (CMC) is authorised to prevent wine tartaric instability. The effect of CMC structural characteristics on their effectiveness is not well understood. The main purpose of this study was to compare the impact of CMC’s with different degrees of substitution and molecular weight, on tartaric stability, tartaric acid, mineral concentration, phenolic compounds, chromatic and sensory characteristics in white wines, and compare its effectiveness with other oenological additives. Mini-contact test showed that all CMC’s and metatartaric acid stabilized the wines; however, some arabic gums and mannoproteins do not stabilized the wines. CMC’s had no significant effect on tartaric acid, potassium, calcium and sensory attributes. Tartaric stabilization effectiveness depends on CMC’s degree of substitution, but also on wine matrix, probably its initial potassium content. Results suggest that CMC is a good alternative to white wine tartaric stabilization; nevertheless deeper structure knowledge is necessary in order to choose the appropriate CMC for a given tartaric instability.
Keywords :
Arabic Gum , Mannoprotein , Carboxylmethylcellulose , Metatartaric acid , Phenolic compounds , Tartaric stability , Conductivity , White wine
Journal title :
Food Chemistry
Serial Year :
2014
Journal title :
Food Chemistry
Record number :
1977679
Link To Document :
بازگشت