Inhibition of enamel mineral loss by fissure sealant: An in situ study

Objectives tudy evaluated the effect of fluoride and non-fluoride sealants on hardness decrease (HD) and marginal adaptation (MA) on enamel substrates after cariogenic challenge. s al enamel blocks, from human third molars, were randomly divided into six groups (n = 12), according to occlusal fissures condition (S – sound; C – caries-like lesion; CF – caries-like lesion + topical fluoride) and sealants (F – FluroShield; H – Helioseal Clear Chroma). Lesion depths were 79.3 ± 33.9 and 61.3 ± 23.9 for C and CF groups, respectively. Sealants were placed on occlusal surface and stored at 100% humidity (37 °C; 24 h/d). HD was measured by cross-sectional microhardness analysis at the sealant margin distances: −1 (under sealant), 0 (sealant margin), 1, 2 (outer sealant). Sealant MA was observed by polarized light microscopy and scored according to: 0 – failure (no sealant MA or total sealant loss); 1 – success (sealant MA present). MA and HD were analysed by ANOVA-R and mixed model analysis, respectively. s (ΔS), F values (6900.5 ± 3686.6) were significantly lower than H values (8534.6 ± 5375.3) regardless of enamel substrates and sealant margin distances. Significant differences were observed among sealant margin distances: −1 (5934.0 ± 3282.6) < 0 (8701.5 ± 6175.7) = 1 (8473.2 ± 4299.4) = 2 (7761.5 ± 4035.1), regardless of sealant and substrate. MA was similar for all groups (p ≥ 0.05). sion not affected by sealant type or substrate condition, whereas enamel HD was favourably impacted by fluoride in the sealant. In addition, sealants were more effective as a physical barrier than as its chemical potency in reducing enamel HD. al significance g with a fluoride material is a recommended procedure to prevent caries of occlusal permanent molars in high-caries-risk patients, even though those exhibiting white spot lesions, since the enamel hardness decrease when fluoride sealant was used in vitro.