Title of article :
Is non-cavitated proximal lesion sealing an effective method for caries control in primary and permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Author/Authors :
Ammari، نويسنده , , Michelle Mikhael and Soviero، نويسنده , , Vera Mendes and da Silva Fidalgo، نويسنده , , Tatiana Kelly and Lenzi، نويسنده , , Michele and Ferreira، نويسنده , , Daniele Masterson T.P. and Mattos، نويسنده , , Clلudia Trindade and de Souza، نويسنده , , Ivete Pomarico Ribeiro and Maia، نويسنده , , Lucianne Cople، نويسنده ,
Pages :
11
From page :
1217
To page :
1227
Abstract :
AbstractObjectives m of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of sealing non-cavitated proximal caries lesions in primary and permanent teeth. ontrolled clinical trials and randomized controlled clinical trials that evaluated the effectiveness of sealing on non-cavitated proximal caries with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included in the study. The primary outcome should be arrestment/progression of proximal caries evaluated by bitewing radiographs. A risk of bias evaluation based on the Cochrane Collaboration common scheme for bias was carried out for each study. The meta-analysis was performed on the studies considered low risk of bias and with pair-wise visual reading results through RevMan software. s rehensive search was performed in the Systematic Electronic Databases: Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, IBI Web of Science, Lilacs, SIGLE, and on website Clinical trials.gov, through until June 2013. selection 67 studies identified, 10 articles and 3 studies with partial results were assessed for eligibility. However three articles were excluded and our final sample included 10 studies. According to the risk of bias evaluation, six studies were considered “high” risk of bias, and four “low” risk of bias. The forest plot of the meta-analysis showed low heterogeneity (I2 = 29%) and a favourable outcome for the Infiltrant. The chance of caries progression when this technique was used was significantly lower (p = 0.002) compared with Placebo. sion sults suggest that the technique of sealing non-cavitated proximal caries seems to be effective in controlling proximal caries in the short and medium term. Further long-term randomized clinical trials are still necessary to increase this evidence. al significance porary dentistry is focused in minimally invasive approaches that prevent the destruction of sound dental tissues next to carious lesions. This paper searches for evidence of the efficacy of sealing/infiltrating non-cavitated proximal caries in arresting caries progression both in permanent and primary teeth.
Keywords :
efficacy , Therapy , Adhesives , Composite resin , Dental caries , systematic review
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics
Record number :
2040309
Link To Document :
بازگشت