Title of article
The scholarly exchange of knowledge in Operations Management
Author/Authors
Linderman، نويسنده , , Kevin and Chandrasekaran، نويسنده , , Aravind، نويسنده ,
Pages
10
From page
357
To page
366
Abstract
A number of studies have investigated the quality of journals in Operations Management. This research steps back from these studies and investigates the exchange of ideas within Operations Management journals and between other management disciplines (Management, Marketing, and Finance) during the last decade (1998–2007). Journal citation metrics provide a measure for the exchange of scholarly ideas. Operations Management (OM) journals show a willingness to cross-pollinate ideas with other management disciplines. But, they also tend to have a higher level of self citations and lower level of within discipline citation exchanges when compared to other management disciplines. As a result, Operations Management journals may reflect methodological silos in the field that could potentially dampen scholarly exchange. In general, increasing the diversity of scholarly exchanges within Operations Management, and conducting more cross-disciplinary research with other management disciples should improve the scholarly development of Operations Management.
Keywords
Inter-disciplinary , Citation exchange among disciplines , knowledge , citation analysis , Co-citations interpretive methods
Journal title
Astroparticle Physics
Record number
2040784
Link To Document