Title of article :
Is the Double Dose Alpha-Blocker Treatment Superior Than the Single Dose in the Management Of Patients Suffering From Acute Urinary Retention Caused By Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia?
Author/Authors :
Kara، Onder نويسنده Department of Urology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, 06100, Ankara, Turkey , , Yazici، Merve نويسنده Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara University School of Medicine, 06100, Ankara, Turkey ,
Issue Information :
دوماهنامه با شماره پیاپی 43 سال 2014
Abstract :
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of single (tamsulosin) and double dose (tamsulosin
+ alfuzosin) alpha-blocker therapy for treating catheterized patients with acute urinary
retention (AUR) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Materials and Methods: Seventy patients with AUR due to BPH were catheterized and randomized
into two groups: the single dose group (0.4 mg tamsulosin, 35 patients) and the double
dose group (0.4 mg tamsulosin + 10 mg alfuzosin, 35 patients). The catheter was removed after
3 days, and the patients were put on trial without catheter (TWOC).
Results: Seventy males (mean age, 71.2 years) were randomly assigned to receive double or
single dose alpha-blocker (35 patients per group). The intent-to-treat population consisted of
70 males. Twenty-seven individuals in the double dose group and 19 in the single dose group
did not require re-catheterization on the day of the TWOC (77% and 54%, respectively; P =
.003). Success using free-flow variables was also higher in the males who received double
dose alpha-blocker compared with single dose therapy (48% vs. 40%; P = .017).
Conclusion: TWOC was more successful in males treated with double dose alpha-blockers,
and the subsequent need for re-catheterization was also reduced. The side-effect profiles were
similar in the single and double dose alpha-blocker groups and were consistent with the
known pharmacology. These results state that double dose alpha-blocker treatment can be
recommended for treating males after catheterization for AUR, which may reduce the need
for re-catheterization.
Journal title :
Urology Journal
Journal title :
Urology Journal