Author/Authors :
Yildirim، Mehmet Erol نويسنده Department of Urology, Turgut Ozal University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara 06510, Turkey. , , Koc، Akif نويسنده Department of Urology, Bal?- kesir University, Faculty of Me- dicine, Balikesir 10310, Turkey. , , Kaygusuz، Ikbal Cekmen نويسنده Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Turgut Ozal Univer- sity Faculty of Mediine, Ankara 06510, Turkey. , , Badem، Hüseyin نويسنده Department of Urology, Yüksek ?htisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06520, Turkey. , , Karatas، Omer Faruk نويسنده Department of Urology, Turgut Ozal University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara 06510, Turkey. , , Cimentepe، Ersin نويسنده Department of Urology, Turgut Ozal University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara 06510, Turkey. , , Unal، Dogan نويسنده Department of Urology, Hacet- tepe University Faculty of Me- dicine, Ankara 06520, Turkey ,
Abstract :
Purpose: To evaluate the predictive power of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone, testicular biopsy histology and male age were evaluated with respect to the success of sperm retrieval in a microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) procedure, pregnancy and live birth rates.
Materials and Methods: We examined the data of 131 infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia, who have undergone microTESE operation. The men were classified into two groups based on serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels ? 15 mIU/mL (group 1) and > 15 mIU/mL (group 2).
Results: Group 1 consisted of 59 patients (mean age 36.2 ± 6.2 years) and group 2 consisted of 72 (mean age 38.8 ± 7.4 years) patients. Sperm retrieval and pregnancy rates were 66.1% and 16.9% in normal FSH group, respectively. These parameters were higher than those of men with FSH > 15 (43% and 8.3%, respectively). Only 128 patients had histopathological diagnosis. Sperm was retrieved from 12/30 (40%) patients with maturation arrest, 9/29 (31.03%) patients with seminiferous tubules atrophy, 14/40 (35%) patients with sertoli cell only syndrome and 13/13 (100%) of patients with hypospermatogenesis. There was no statistically significant difference in pathological diagnosis between pregnancy and live birth rates.
Conclusion: These results demonstrate that there is a significant difference with sperm retrieval, pregnancy
rates and live birth rates comparing the FSH levels. Histopathological findings did not associate with successful microTESE, pregnancy rates and live birth rates.