Author/Authors :
امامي اردكاني، عليرضا نويسنده بيمارستان دكتر شريعتي Emami-Ardakani, Alireza , فلاحي، بابك نويسنده موسسه تحقيقات پزشكي هسته اي-بيمارستان دكتر شريعتي-دانشگاه علوم پزشكي تهران Fallahi, B. , اميني، منوچهر نويسنده , , فرد اصفهاني، ارمغان نويسنده دانشگاه علوم پزشكي تهران,مركز تحقيقات پزشكي هسته اي، بيمارستان دكتر شريعي , , بيگي، داوود نويسنده Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Beiki, Davood , فرزانه فر، سعيد نويسنده Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Farzanefar, Saeed , عباسي ، مهرشاد نويسنده , , صادقيان، ليلا نويسنده , , افتخاري ، محمد 1329 نويسنده پزشکي , , ساغري ، محسن نويسنده Saghari, M
Abstract :
Introduction: We intended to assess the accuracy of re-expressed Modification of Diet for Renal Disease (MDRD) and
Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in chronic kidney disease in two different
etiologies of acute renal failure (ARF): acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and acute glomerulonephritis (AGN).
Methods: Patients admitted for ARF or the patients complicated with ARF during the course of their hospitalization were
enrolled to the study (n=21; 14 females and 7 males; 11 ATN and 12 AGN). When the plasma creatinine reached a steady
state ( < 15% change in two consecutive days), GFR was measured with double plasma sample method (GFRDPSM) using
99mTc-DTPA. GFR was also estimated by MDRD (GFRMDRD) and CG (GFRCG) equations.
Results: The patients aged 44.8±19.5 years and weighted 67.8±10.7kg. GFRDPSM (32.9±14.7 ml/min) was statistically
different from the GFRMDRD (11.6±8.2 ml/min; p < 0.001) and CG-GFR (16.5±10ml/min; p < 0.001). The difference between
DPSM-GFR and MDRD-GFR was statistically significant in patients with either ATN (n=11; 31.9±15.0 vs.
11.7±10.3ml/min and p=0.001) or AGN (n=10; 34.1±15.1 vs. 11.4±5.6 ml/min and p=0.001); similarly the GFRCG was
lower than GFRDPSM in patients with either ATN (16.5±12.5ml/min and p < 0.01) or AGN (16.3±7.1ml/min and p < 0.005). No
statistically significant correlation was found between the GFRDPSM and GFRMDRD (r=0.34; p=0.13) but GFRDPSM and
GFRCG values were correlated (r=0.48; p=0.03). Out of subjects with GFRDPSM > 30, 92.3% had GFRMDRD < 30ml/min and
84.6% had GFRCG < 30ml/min.
Conclusion: Our results indicate that MDRD and CG equations were substantially inaccurate in patients with ARF. More
precise methods of GFR evaluation is recommended in these patients.