Teleological reasoning in infancy: The infantʹs naive theory of rational action: A reply to Premack and Premack

We argue that Premack and Premackʹs criticism of our demonstration (Gergely et al., 1995) of interpreting goal-directed action in one year-olds in terms of the principle of rationality are ill-founded, and their suggested alternative test for goal-attribution is open to lower level interpretations. We show that the alterative model they propose for our data in terms of `appropriateʹ change of means action is but a somewhat imprecise restatement of our account of the infantʹs naive theory of rational action. Finally, we elaborate and clarify our model of the teleological stance in infancy which we suggest is an as yet nonmentalistic precursor of the young childʹs later emerging causal theory of mind.