Title of article :
Neural net modeling of estuarine indicators: Hindcasting phytoplankton biomass and net ecosystem production in the Neuse (North Carolina) and Trout (Florida) Rivers, USA
Author/Authors :
Millie، نويسنده , , David F. and Weckman، نويسنده , , Gary R. and Paerl، نويسنده , , Hans W. and Pinckney، نويسنده , , James L. and Bendis، نويسنده , , Brian J. and Pigg، نويسنده , , Ryan J. and Fahnenstiel، نويسنده , , Gary L.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Abstract :
Phytoplankton biomass, as chlorophyll (Chl) a, and net ecosystem production (NEP), were modeled using artificial neural networks (ANNs). Chl a varied seasonally and along a saline gradient throughout the Neuse River (North Carolina). NEP was extremely dynamic in the Trout River (Florida), with phototrophic or heterotrophic conditions occurring over short-term intervals. Physical and chemical variables, arising from meteorological and hydrological conditions, created spatial and/or temporal gradients in both systems and served as interacting predictors for the trends/patterns of Chl a and NEP. ANNs outperformed comparable linear regression models and reliably modeled Chl a concentrations less than 20 μg L−1 and NEP values, denoting the apparent non-linear interactions among abiotic and indicator variables. ANNs underestimated Chl a concentrations greater than 20 μg L−1, likely due to the periodicity of data acquisition not being sufficient to generalize system variability, the designated ‘lag’ effect for variables not being adequate to portray estuarine flow dynamics, the exclusion of (one or more) variables that would have improved prediction, and/or an unrealistic expectation of network performance. Variables indicative of meteorological and hydrological forcing and/or proxy measurements of phytoplankton had the greatest relative impact on prediction of Chl a and NEP. Except for their predictive capability, ANNs might appear to be of limited value for ecological applications and problem solving; interpreting the absolute impact of and/or interacting relationships among network variables is intrinsically difficult. Statistical methods or ‘rule extraction’ algorithms that convey comprehensible network interpretation are needed prior to the routine use of ANNs in programs assessing and/or forecasting the response of biotic indicators to perturbation or for a means to discern estuarine function.
Keywords :
NEURAL NETWORKS , ecosystem modeling , Algae , Regression , estuary
Journal title :
Ecological Indicators
Journal title :
Ecological Indicators