Community congruence of plants, invertebrates and birds in natural and constructed shallow open-water wetlands: Do we need to monitor multiple assemblages?

Biomonitoring is a common means of evaluating wetlands. It is based on the premise that the community composition of one taxonomic group is indicative of overall biology and the underlying environmental conditions at a wetland. To be a good bioindicator, there must be adequate concordance between the indicator group and other biotic assemblages. Otherwise, multi-assemblage monitoring is necessary to glean a complete picture of wetland condition. In 32 sites ranging from reference wetlands to stormwater retention ponds, we evaluated concordance in community composition among the six most commonly monitored wetland assemblages: waterfowl, wetland dependent songbirds, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and plants in the wet meadow, emergent, and open-water vegetation zones. We also assessed agreement in environmental correlates among these six assemblages and investigated the impact of human disturbance on cross-assemblage concordance. We found that cross-assemblage concordance was positive (p < 0.03 in 14 of 15 pair-wise comparisons, p = 0.06 in 15th case), but relatively low (Mantel R values 0.11–0.37), suggesting that the assemblages are mediocre surrogates for one another. Yet, we found very strong agreement among environmental correlates of the six assemblages, especially along the first axis of assemblage-specific ordinations (mean Spearman rho = 0.923), indicating that despite low concordance, the six assemblages are likely responding to the same environmental gradients. Thus, while a single assemblage may not serve as a surrogate for the other assemblages, it should yield an adequate estimate of underlying environmental conditions and the degree of disturbance. Most important among the environmental correlates were sediment and water nutrient levels, shoreline slope, and the size of wet meadow and emergent vegetation zones. Perhaps most interestingly, we found that the strength of cross-assemblage concordance was greatest in reference wetlands and was lower (p ≤ 0.05) in constructed wetlands. This implies that cross-assemblage concordance present in undisturbed sites may not persist in disturbed wetlands where several of these cross-assemblage relationships deteriorate. Furthermore, a general change in cross-assemblage concordance may itself be indicative of human disturbance in wetlands.