• Title of article

    The comparative characteristics of snake and kiwi fruits

  • Author/Authors

    Gorinstein، نويسنده , , Shela and Haruenkit، نويسنده , , Ratiporn and Poovarodom، نويسنده , , Sumitra and Park، نويسنده , , Yong-Seo and Vearasilp، نويسنده , , Suchada and Suhaj، نويسنده , , Milan and Ham، نويسنده , , Kyung-Sik and Heo، نويسنده , , Buk-Gu and Cho، نويسنده , , Ja-Yong and Jang، نويسنده , , Hong Gi، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    1884
  • To page
    1891
  • Abstract
    In the time of globalization many of the tropical fruits can be find at the markets of Europe and North America. Most customers are not familiar with the nutritional and proliferative values of these fruits. Therefore, a less known snake fruit was compared with better known kiwi fruit, using fluorometry, FT-IR spectroscopy, several radical scavenging and proliferative assays and statistical evaluation. found similarity between snake fruit (cultivar Sumalee) and kiwi fruit (cultivar Hayward) in the contents of polyphenols (8.15–7.91, mg GAE g−1 DW), antioxidant values by DPPH (11.28–10.24, μMTE g−1 DW), and antiproliferative activities on both human cancer cell lines (Calu-6 for human pulmonary carcinoma, and SMU-601 for human gastric carcinoma, 90.5–87.6 and 89.3–87.1%, cell survival, respectively). clusion, snake fruit cultivar Sumalee is comparable with kiwi fruit cultivar Hayward. Two fruits can be used as supplements to the normal diet. Consumption of a combination of both fruits could be recommended in order to receive the best results.
  • Keywords
    Antiproliferative activities , Snake and kiwi fruits , Bioactive compounds , Antioxidant potential
  • Journal title
    Food and Chemical Toxicology
  • Serial Year
    2009
  • Journal title
    Food and Chemical Toxicology
  • Record number

    2121114