Title of article :
Evaluation of the marginal integrity of ceramic copings with different marginal angles using two different CAD/CAM systems
Author/Authors :
Giannetopoulos، نويسنده , , Sotiris and van Noort، نويسنده , , Richard and Tsitrou، نويسنده , , Effrosyni، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Pages :
7
From page :
980
To page :
986
Abstract :
Objectives estigate and compare the marginal integrity of ceramic copings constructed with the CEREC3 and the EVEREST system employing three different margin angle designs and explore to what extent these CAD/CAM machines can produce acute marginal angles creating restorations with acceptable margins. als and methods brass models were prepared with a different marginal finish line, namely a 0° bevel (or 90° shoulder), a 30° bevel and a 60° bevel. Ten restorations were produced for each finishing line and CAD/CAM system, respectively. The copings were milled from lithium disilicate glass ceramic blocks (IPS e.max® CAD). An impression was taken for each model to fabricate a series of 10 replica dies for each marginal design. Quantitative analysis of the margins of each coping was performed using digital photography and image analysis software. The marginal integrity of the restorations was evaluated by detecting and measuring any signs of marginal chipping and the Chipping Factor (CF) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using Univariate Analysis of Variance and multiple comparisons (Tukey HSD). s erage Chipping Factor (CF) of the CEREC copings was: 2.8% for the 0° bevel angle, 3.5% for the 30° bevel angle and 10% for the 60° bevel angle. For the EVEREST copings the average CF was: 0.6% for the 0° bevel angle, 3.2% for the 30° bevel angle and 2.0% for the 60° bevel angle. Univariate Analysis of Variance and multiple comparisons showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the quality of margins between the two systems for the 0° and 60° bevel finishing line. sions sults of this study indicated that the introduction of a marginal angle of the restoration increases the potential for marginal chipping. Different CAD/CAM systems which employ different milling processes produce restorations with different amount of marginal chipping, although this only became apparent for a marginal angle of a 60°.
Keywords :
Ceramic copings , Marginal chipping , Lithium disilicate , CEREC , CAD/CAM , Chipping Factor , EVEREST
Journal title :
Journal of Dentistry
Serial Year :
2010
Journal title :
Journal of Dentistry
Record number :
2129323
Link To Document :
بازگشت