Title of article :
Cost-effectiveness of silicone and alginate impressions for complete dentures
Author/Authors :
Hulme، نويسنده , , C. and Yu، نويسنده , , G. T. Browne and S. M. Shaw، نويسنده , , C. and O’Dwyer، نويسنده , , John J. and Craddock، نويسنده , , H. and Brown، نويسنده , , S. and Gray، نويسنده , , J. and Pavitt، نويسنده , , S. and Fernandez، نويسنده , , C. and Godfrey، نويسنده , , M. and Dukanovic، نويسنده , , James G. and Brunton، نويسنده , , P. and Hyde، نويسنده , , T.P.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages :
6
From page :
902
To page :
907
Abstract :
AbstractObjective m of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of silicone and alginate impressions for complete dentures. s ffectiveness analyses were undertaken alongside a UK single centre, double blind, controlled, crossover clinical trial. Taking the perspective of the healthcare sector, effectiveness is measured using the EuroQol (EQ-5D-3L) which provides a single index value for health status that may be combined with time to produce quality adjusted life years (QALYs); and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-EDENT). Incremental cost effectiveness ratios are presented representing the additional cost per one unit gained. s ost was higher in the silicone impression group (£388.57 vs. £363.18). Negligible between-group differences were observed in QALY gains; the silicone group had greater mean OHIP-EDENT gains. The additional cost using silicone was £3.41 per change of one point in the OHIP-EDENT. sions licone group was more costly, driven by the cost of materials. Changes in the EQ-5D and QALY gains over time and between arms were not statistically significant. Change in OHIP-EDENT score showed greater improvement in the silicone group and the difference between arms was statistically significant. Given negligible QALY gains and low level of resource use, results must be treated with caution. It is difficult to make robust claims about the comparative cost-effectiveness. al significance ne impressions for complete dentures improve patients’ quality of life (OHIP-EDENT score). The extra cost of silicone impressions is £30 per patient. Dentists, patients and health care funders need to consider the clinical and financial value of silicone impressions. Different patients, different dentists, different health funders will have individual perceptions and judgements. 01528038. fPB grant PB-PG-0408-16300. rticle forms part of a project for which the author (TPH) won the Senior Clinical Unilever Hatton Award of the International Assocation for Dental Research, Capetown, South Africa, June 2014.
Keywords :
Resource , Prosthodontics , Impression Materials , Quality-of life , Cost Effectiveness , Cost
Journal title :
Journal of Dentistry
Serial Year :
2014
Journal title :
Journal of Dentistry
Record number :
2130412
Link To Document :
بازگشت