Title of article
Implementation and Assessment of the Use of Real-Time PCR in Routine Diagnosis for Bordetella pertussis Detection in Brazil
Author/Authors
Leite، Daniela نويسنده Center of Bacteriology, National Reference Laboratory for Pertussis, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Sao Paulo, Brazil , , Morozetti Blanco، Roberta نويسنده Center of Bacteriology, National Reference Laboratory for Pertussis, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Sao Paulo, Brazil , , Cecilia Vieira de Melo، Leyva نويسنده Center of Bacteriology, National Reference Laboratory for Pertussis, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Sao Paulo, Brazil , , Eduardo Fiorio، Cleiton نويسنده Center of Bacteriology, National Reference Laboratory for Pertussis, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Sao Paulo, Brazil , , Moura Martins، Luciano نويسنده Center of Bacteriology, National Reference Laboratory for Pertussis, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Sao Paulo, Brazil , , Mara Ibelli Vaz، Tania نويسنده Center of Bacteriology, National Reference Laboratory for Pertussis, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Sao Paulo, Brazil , , Aparecida Fernandes، Sueli نويسنده Center of Bacteriology, National Reference Laboratory for Pertussis, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Sao Paulo, Brazil , , Tavares Sacchi، Claudio نويسنده Center of Imunology, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Sao Paulo, Brazil ,
Issue Information
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2014
Pages
7
From page
196
To page
202
Abstract
Bordetella pertussis is the causative agent of pertussis. In Brazil, laboratory diagnosis of pertussis is based on the culture. In 2010, was standardized the Real-Time PCR TaqMan® in routine diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact achieved with the introduction of RT-PCR for the routine diagnosis of pertussis and to compare with the results obtained from culture. 4,697 samples of nasopharyngeal secretions collected from suspected pertussis cases and/or contacts were analyzed for RT-PCR and culture, from January 2008 until the end of December 2011. According to the results obtained from the samples 6.9% were culture/RT-PCR positive, 14.8% were positive only for RT-PCR and 0.2% only for culture. Negative samples for both techniques was 3,622 (77.1%) and 1.0% were inconclusive for RT-PCR. The implementation of RT-PCR in routine diagnosis resulted in an increase in laboratory confirmation by almost three times. The RT-PCR assay does not intend to replace the culture technique, but to promote an improvement in the diagnosis of pertussis.
Journal title
Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Serial Year
2014
Journal title
Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Record number
2149455
Link To Document