• Title of article

    Secondary fluorescence correction formulae for X-ray microanalysis — I Parallel-sided thin foil, wedge, and bulk specimens

  • Author/Authors

    Anderson، نويسنده , , I.M. and Bentley، نويسنده , , J. and Carter، نويسنده , , C.B.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    دوماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1997
  • Pages
    18
  • From page
    77
  • To page
    94
  • Abstract
    Secondary fluorescence correction formulae have been derived for specimen geometries that are commonly employed in the analytical electron microscope. Formulae have been derived for parallel-sided thin foil and bulk (electron probe microanalysis) specimens, for which established correction formulae currently exist, and for wedge-shaped specimens, for which no formulae have been available to date. All derivations explicitly account for the absorption of fluoresced X-rays leaving the specimen en route to the spectrometer, which the existing correction formulae neglected wholly or in part. It is shown that the existing secondary fluorescence correction formula of Nockolds et al. for parallel-sided thin foils, which entirely neglects the absorption of secondary X-rays, is sufficiently accurate as long as the “sec α” factor is omitted. An additional factor (y(x + y) in Reedʹs notation) should be appended to the existing secondary fluorescence correction formula for bulk specimens in the electron probe microanalyzer to account for near-surface absorption of fluoresced X-rays, which was neglected by Castaing. The difference in the secondary fluorescence corrections calculated with the Φ(ϱz) dependencies of Lenard (exponential) and Packwood and Brown (modified Gaussian) is shown to be negligible.
  • Keywords
    X-ray microanalysis
  • Journal title
    Ultramicroscopy
  • Serial Year
    1997
  • Journal title
    Ultramicroscopy
  • Record number

    2154781