• Title of article

    Modes of handling Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) data and reporting values in product labelling

  • Author/Authors

    Stockham، نويسنده , , Katherine and Paimin، نويسنده , , Rohani and Orbell، نويسنده , , John D. and Adorno، نويسنده , , Paul and Buddhadasa، نويسنده , , Saman، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    686
  • To page
    691
  • Abstract
    Antioxidant measurement assays are widely used and should be chosen based on their being fit for purpose. Likewise, the mode of reporting antioxidant measurements should also be fit for purpose. The Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) assay is widely used internationally for measuring the antioxidant capacity of commodities using the peroxyl radical. However, the current mode of reporting of the ORAC values is not obvious, especially for the consumer groups. In this mode, reporting of the ORAC values is the unit of micromoles of vitamin E analogue (VEA), known commercially as Trolox Equivalents per kilogram or per litre (μM T.E./kg or L). Unlike mass units, molar units are not widely used in nutrition information panels (NIP). This paper presents a simple mathematical model for conversion of ORAC values to mass units to facilitate better understanding of the antioxidant capacity quoted. Additionally, mass values are in keeping with current labelling practice in Australia. Unless legislation is passed for the regulation of ORAC data use in labelling and product marketing, mass units should be considered as a mode of reporting, limiting sensationalism of antioxidant capacity and keeping with current labelling practice.
  • Keywords
    Food labelling , ascorbic acid , Nutrition information panel , ORAC , antioxidants , Trolox , Mass units , Vitamin E analogue
  • Journal title
    Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
  • Serial Year
    2011
  • Journal title
    Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
  • Record number

    2168983