Title of article
Soil microbial biomass in Amazonian soils: Evaluation of methods and estimates of pool sizes
Author/Authors
Feigl، نويسنده , , B.J. and Sparling، نويسنده , , G.P. and Ross، نويسنده , , D.J. and Cerri، نويسنده , , C.C.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1995
Pages
6
From page
1467
To page
1472
Abstract
The suitability of the fumigation-incubation (FI), fumigation-extraction (FE) (with specific k-factor determined by 14C-labelling) and substrate induced respiration (SIR) methods to obtain measures of the microbial biomass in forest soils from the Amazonian basin was examined. Several representitive topsoil (0–10 cm) samples were studied. A reasonable estimate of microbial biomass C in two acid Oxisols (pH <4.5) with a high clay content was obtained by the FI method, provided no correction was applied for basal CO2 respiration. However, on two Ultisols and one Alfisol more consistent estimates of microbial C were obtained by the FI method, where correction for basal respiration was obtained using the respiration of non-fumigated (NF) soils between 0–10 d, or fumigated (F) soils between 10–20 d. Estimates of microbial C by the FE method did not differ significantly from those obtained by the FI method when calculated using a specifically-determined k-factor of 0.26 to convert the extractable-C flush to microbial biomass C. In the Ultisols and the Alfisol, the SIR method gave similar estimates of microbial C to those obtained by the FI and FE methods, but in both Oxisols microbial C was underestimated when a standard conversion factor was applied. Possibly the SIR assay was adversely affected by a high proportion of dormant organisms and a slow gaseous release of respired CO2 from these heavy clay soils. When estimated using the FE method, microbial C was in the range 890–1100 μg C g−1 soil in the Oxisols, 340–470 μg C g−1 soil in the Ultisols and around 580 μg C g−1 soil in the Alfisol. Microbial C comprised 3–4% of the total soil organic C and microbial N 4–7% of total N. Microbial C-to-N ratios averaged 6.9 ± 0.8. Although the FI method can be used on these Amazonian soils, the FE method is more convenient and generally appears suitable for estimating both microbial C and N in the same extract. The SIR method is not recommened for use with Oxisols.
Journal title
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Serial Year
1995
Journal title
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Record number
2179203
Link To Document