Flooding responses of three earthworm species, Allolobophora chlorotica, Aporrectodea caliginosa and Lumbricus rubellus, in a laboratory-controlled environment

To get a better understanding of earthworm’ responses towards flooding, three laboratory experiments were performed with the species Allolobophora chlorotica, Aporrectodea caliginosa and Lumbricus rubellus. ng response was determined in a pot experiment, in which the earthworms were incubated for 42 days in flooded or non-flooded soil, with or without heavy metal pollution. To determine moisture preference, earthworms were incubated for 9 days in aquaria with five compartments, containing soil with a moisture gradient (%, w/w), ranging from 35%, 45% (field capacity), 55%, 65% (saturated) to 65%+ (saturated and an extra water layer). Effects on earthworm health were studied by incubating earthworms of each species for 42 days in soil with the same range of moisture contents and determining the dry/wet weight ratio and dry weight gain as an indication of earthworm health. orotica was tolerant to water, although the worms tended to escape from flooded soil. Their health was significantly lower in the flooded soils (P<0.05). A. caliginosa showed little response to flooding. This species, however, was affected by the heavy metal pollution in the pot experiment. L. rubellus was sensitive towards flooding, with escape and avoidance behaviour being the main mechanism of survival. This species was able to survive when forced to stay in flooded soil for at least 42 days, but this significantly reduced its health (P<0.05). results suggest that earthworms are able to survive in inundated soils, but there are large differences between species in response to flooding conditions.