Author/Authors :
Molaee، Neda نويسنده Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Arak University of Medical sciences, Arak, Iran , , Abtahi، Hamid نويسنده Department of Microbiology, Molecular and Medicine Research Center, Arak University of Medical Sciences Abtahi, Hamid , Ghannadzadeh، Mohammad Javad نويسنده Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran , , Karimi، Masoude نويسنده Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Arak University of Medical sciences, Arak, Iran , , Ghaznavi-Rad، Ehsanollah نويسنده Department of microbiology and immunology, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran. Ghaznavi-Rad, Ehsanollah
Abstract :
Background: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is preferred to other methods for detecting Escherichia coli (E. coli) in
water in terms of speed, accuracy and efficiency. False positive result is considered as the major disadvantages of
PCR. For this reason, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) can be used to solve this problem.
The aim of present study was to determine the efficiency of RT-PCR for rapid detection of viable Escherichia coli in
drinking water samples and enhance its sensitivity through application of different filter membranes.
Materials and methods: Specific primers were designed for 16S rRNA and elongation Factor II genes. Different
concentrations of bacteria were passed through FHLP and HAWP filters. Then, RT-PCR was performed using 16srRNA
and EF –Tu primers. Contamination of 10 wells was determined by RT-PCR in Arak city. To evaluate RT-PCR efficiency,
the results were compared with most probable number (MPN) method.
Results: RT-PCR is able to detect bacteria in different concentrations. Application of EF II primers reduced false positive
results compared to 16S rRNA primers. The FHLP hydrophobic filters have higher ability to absorb bacteria compared
with HAWB hydrophilic filters. So the use of hydrophobic filters will increase the sensitivity of RT-PCR.
Conclusion: RT-PCR shows a higher sensitivity compared to conventional water contamination detection method.
Unlike PCR, RT-PCR does not lead to false positive results. The use of EF-Tu primers can reduce the incidence of false
positive results. Furthermore, hydrophobic filters have a higher ability to absorb bacteria compared to hydrophilic filters