Title of article :
The main indicators for iranian hospital ethical accreditation
Author/Authors :
ENJOO، SEYED ALI نويسنده Medical Ethics Department, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , , Amini، Mitra نويسنده Education Development and Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IRAN Amini, Mitra , TABEI، SEYED ZIAADIN نويسنده Medical Ethics Department, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , , Mahbudi، Ali نويسنده Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, English Language Department , , KAVOSI، ZAHRA نويسنده Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , , SABER، MAHBOOBEH نويسنده Quality improvement in clinical education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2015
Abstract :
Introduction: The application of organizational ethics in hospitals
is one of the novel ways to improve medical ethics. Nowadays
achieving efficient and sufficient ethical hospital indicators seems
to be inevitable. In this connection, the present study aims to
determine the best indicators in hospital accreditation.
Methods: 69 indicators in 11 fields to evaluate hospital ethics
were achieved through a five-step qualitative and quantitative
study including literature review, expert focus group, Likert scale
survey, 3 rounded Delphi, and content validity measurement.
Expert focus group meeting was conducted, employing Nominal
Group Technique (NGT). After running NGT, a three rounded
Delphi and parallel to Delphi and a Likert scale survey were
performed to obtain objective indicators for each domain. The
experts were all healthcare professionals who were also medical
ethics researchers, teachers, or Ph.D students. Content validity
measurements were computed, using the viewpoints of two
different expert groups, some ethicists, and some health care
professionals (n=46).
Results: After conducting NGT, Delphi, Likert survey, 11 main
domains were listed including: Informed consent, Medical
confidentiality, Physician-patient economic relations, Ethics
consultation policy in the hospital, Ethical charter of hospital,
Breaking bad medical news protocol, Respect for the patients’
rights, Clinical ethics committee, Spiritual and palliative care unit
programs in the hospitals, Healthcare professionals’ communication
skills, and Equitable access to the healthcare. Also 71 objective
indicators for these 11 domains were listed in 11 tables with 5 to 8
indicators per table. Content Validity Ratio (CVR) measurements
were done and 69 indicators were highlighted.
Conclusion: The domains listed in this study seem to be the
most important ones for evaluating hospital ethics programs
and services. Healthcare organizations’ accreditation and
ranking are crucial for the improvement of healthcare services.
Ethics programs would also motivate hospitals to improve
their services and move towards patients’ satisfaction. In this
regard, more involvement of bioethicists can help healthcare
organizations to develop ethics programs and ensure ethicsbased
practice in hospitals.
Journal title :
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
Journal title :
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism