Title of article :
Rating the ratings: How good are commercial governance ratings?
Author/Authors :
Daines، نويسنده , , Robert M. and Gow، نويسنده , , Ian D. and Larcker، نويسنده , , David F.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Abstract :
Proxy advisory and corporate governance rating firms (such as RiskMetrics/Institutional Shareholder Services, GovernanceMetrics International, and The Corporate Library) play an increasingly important role in U.S. public markets. They rank the quality of firm corporate governance, advise shareholders how to vote, and sometimes press for governance changes. We examine whether commercially available corporate governance rankings provide useful information for shareholders. Our results suggest that they do not. Commercial ratings do not predict governance-related outcomes with the precision or strength necessary to support the bold claims made by most of these firms. Moreover, we find little or no relation between the governance ratings provided by RiskMetrics with either their voting recommendations or the actual votes by shareholders on proxy proposals.
Keywords :
Corporate governance , Governance ratings
Journal title :
Journal of Financial Economics
Journal title :
Journal of Financial Economics