Title of article
Two Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: Flaws in Alternatives to Fee-for-Service Payment Plans Do Not Mean Fee-for-Service Is a Good Solution to Rising Prices; Comment on “Fee-for-Service Payment - An Evil Pr
Author/Authors
Koppel ، Ross نويسنده Sociology Department, School of Medicine, Leonard Davis Institute (Wharton), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA ,
Issue Information
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2015
Pages
2
From page
611
To page
612
Abstract
Professor Naoki Ikegami’s “Fee-for-service payment – an evil practice that must be stamped out” summarizes many of the failings of alternatives to fee-for-service (FFS) payment systems. His article also offers several suggestions for improving FFS systems. However, even powerful arguments against many of the alternatives to FFS, does not make a convincing argument for FFS systems. In addition, there are significant misunderstandings in Professor Ikegami’s presentation of and use of United States payment methods, the role of private vs. public insurance systems, and the increasing role of “accountable care organizations.”
Journal title
International Journal of Health Policy and Management(IJHPM)
Serial Year
2015
Journal title
International Journal of Health Policy and Management(IJHPM)
Record number
2222114
Link To Document