Title of article :
Individual differences in face identification postdict eyewitness accuracy
Author/Authors :
Ahmed M. and Bindemann، نويسنده , , Markus and Brown، نويسنده , , Chennelle and Koyas، نويسنده , , Tiffany and Russ، نويسنده , , Andrew، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Abstract :
Eyewitnesses frequently mistake innocent suspects for the culprits of an observed crime, and such misidentifications have caused the wrongful convictions of many innocent people. This study attempted to establish the accuracy of individual eyewitnesses by assessing their ability to process unfamiliar faces. Observers viewed a staged crime and later tried to select the culprit from an identity lineup. This was followed by a face test that provides a laboratory analogue to lineup identifications. We found that this face test could determine the reliability of individual witnesses when a positive eyewitness identification had been made. Importantly, this was possible based on the specific response that a witness had made and without prior knowledge of whether the culprit was actually present in the lineup. These findings demonstrate that individual differences in face processing provide a potential instrument for postdicting eyewitness accuracy and for preventing miscarriages of justice.
Keywords :
Eyewitness identification , Face Perception , individual differences , Postdictors
Journal title :
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Journal title :
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition