Title of article
Biomechanical evaluation of a fiber-reinforced composite prosthesis supported by implants with and without a microthread collar design
Author/Authors
Meriç، نويسنده , , Gِkçe and Erkmen، نويسنده , , Erkan and Kurt، نويسنده , , Ahmet and Eser، نويسنده , , Atilim and اelik، نويسنده , , Gِkhan، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Pages
8
From page
201
To page
208
Abstract
Background/purpose
r-reinforced composite (FRC) resin system was introduced as an alternative for implant-retained fixed dental prostheses (FDPs); however, the stress distribution in the bone around the implants which support the FRC-FDP has so far not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical behavior of FRC-FDPs supported by implants with different collar geometries.
als and methods
mensional finite element analysis method was selected to evaluate the stress distribution. FRC-FDPs were supported by 2 different dental implant systems with 2 distinct collar geometries: a microthread collar structure (MCS) and a non-MCS (NMCS). In separate load cases, 300-N vertical, 150-N oblique, and 60-N horizontal forces were simulated. Tensile and compressive stress values in the cortical and cancellous bone and von Mises stresses in the fixture-abutment complex, the framework, and veneer material were calculated.
s
S model revealed higher compression stresses at the cortical bone than did the NMCS model under all 3 load conditions. Moreover, higher tensile stresses under the oblique loads at the cortical bone were shown with the MCS model. In each model, stresses were much higher in the implant–abutment complex than in the cortical bone, and they were very low in the cancellous bone.
sion
gh additional experimental and clinical studies are needed, FRC-FDPs can be considered a suitable and alternative treatment choice for an implant-supported prosthesis. The implant design and geometry affect the load-transmission mechanisms. Implants with an MCS that supports FRC-FDPs were shown to be superior in terms of the stress distribution in the bone around the implant compared to implants with an NMCS.
Keywords
Biomechanics , Composite , Implants
Journal title
Journal of Dental Sciences
Serial Year
2010
Journal title
Journal of Dental Sciences
Record number
2232472
Link To Document