Title of article :
Comparative study of measured and modelled number concentrations of nanoparticles in an urban street canyon
Author/Authors :
Kumar، نويسنده , , Prashant and Garmory، نويسنده , , Andrew and Ketzel، نويسنده , , Matthias and Berkowicz، نويسنده , , Ruwim and Britter، نويسنده , , Rex، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages :
10
From page :
949
To page :
958
Abstract :
This study presents a comparison between measured and modelled particle number concentrations (PNCs) in the 10–300 nm size range at different heights in a canyon. The PNCs were modelled using a simple modelling approach (modified Box model, including vertical variation), an Operational Street Pollution Model (OSPM) and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code FLUENT. All models disregarded any particle dynamics. CFD simulations have been carried out in a simplified geometry of the selected street canyon. Four different sizes of emission sources have been used in the CFD simulations to assess the effect of source size on mean PNC distributions in the street canyon. The measured PNCs were between a factor of two and three of those from the three models, suggesting that if the model inputs are chosen carefully, even a simplified approach can predict the PNCs as well as more complex models. CFD simulations showed that selection of the source size was critical to determine PNC distributions. A source size scaling the vehicle dimensions was found to better represent the measured PNC profiles in the lowest part of the canyon. The OSPM and Box model produced similar shapes of PNC profile across the entire height of the canyon, showing a well-mixed region up to first ≈2 m and then decreasing PNCs with increased height. The CFD profiles do correctly reproduce the increase from road level to a height of ≈2 m; however, they do not predict the measured PNC decrease higher in the canyon. The PNC differences were largest between idealised (CFD and Box) and operational (OSPM) models at upper sampling heights; these were attributed to weaker exchange of air between street and roof-above in the upper part of the canyon in the CFD calculations. Possible reasons for these discrepancies are given.
Keywords :
Modelling , Nanoparticles , Particle number concentration , Street canyon , dispersion
Journal title :
Atmospheric Environment
Serial Year :
2009
Journal title :
Atmospheric Environment
Record number :
2234558
Link To Document :
بازگشت