• Title of article

    Numerical estimates of the maximum sustainable pore pressure in anticline formations using the tensor based concept of pore pressure-stress coupling

  • Author/Authors

    Eckert، نويسنده , , Andreas and Zhang، نويسنده , , Weicheng and Liu، نويسنده , , Xiaolong and Paradeis، نويسنده , , Matthew، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2015
  • Pages
    13
  • From page
    60
  • To page
    72
  • Abstract
    The advanced tensor based concept of pore pressure-stress coupling is used to provide pre-injection analytical estimates of the maximum sustainable pore pressure change, ΔPc, for fluid injection scenarios into generic anticline geometries. The heterogeneous stress distribution for different prevailing stress regimes in combination with the Youngʹs modulus (E) contrast between the injection layer and the cap rock and the interbedding friction coefficient, μ, may result in large spatial and directional differences of ΔPc. A single value characterizing the cap rock as for horizontal layered injection scenarios is not obtained. It is observed that a higher Youngʹs modulus in the cap rock and/or a weak mechanical coupling between layers amplifies the maximum and minimum ΔPc values in the valley and limb, respectively. These differences in ΔPc imposed by E and μ are further amplified by different stress regimes. The more compressional the stress regime is, the larger the differences between the maximum and minimum ΔPc values become. The results of this study show that, in general compressional stress regimes yield the largest magnitudes of ΔPc and extensional stress regimes provide the lowest values of ΔPc for anticline formations. Yet this conclusion has to be considered with care when folded anticline layers are characterized by flexural slip and the friction coefficient between layers is low, i.e. μ = 0.1. For such cases of weak mechanical coupling, ΔPc magnitudes may range from 0 MPa to 27 MPa, indicating imminent risk of fault reactivation in the cap rock.
  • Keywords
    Pore pressure–stress coupling , Anticlines , Stress regimes , friction coefficient
  • Journal title
    Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
  • Serial Year
    2015
  • Journal title
    Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
  • Record number

    2234809