Title of article :
A diagnostic comparison of measured and model-predicted speciated VOC concentrations
Author/Authors :
Doraiswamy، نويسنده , , Prakash and Hogrefe، نويسنده , , Christian and Hao، نويسنده , , Winston and Henry، نويسنده , , Robert F. and Civerolo، نويسنده , , Kevin and Ku، نويسنده , , Jia-Yeong and Sistla، نويسنده , , Gopal and Schwab، نويسنده , , James J. and Demerjian، نويسنده , , Kenneth L.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Abstract :
This study compares speciated model-predicted concentrations (i.e., mixing ratios) of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with measurements from the Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) network at sites within the northeastern US during June–August of 2006. Measurements of total non-methane organic compounds (NMOC), ozone (O3), oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and reactive nitrogen species (NOy) are used for supporting analysis. The measured VOC species were grouped into the surrogate classes used by the Carbon Bond IV (CB4) chemical mechanism. It was found that the model typically over-predicted all the CB4 VOC species, except isoprene, which might be linked to overestimated emissions. Even with over-predictions in the CB4 VOC species, model performance for daily maximum O3 was typically within ±15%. Analysis at an urban site in NY, where both NMOC and NOx data were available, suggested that the reasonable ozone performance may be possibly due to compensating overestimated NOx concentrations, thus modulating the NMOC/NOx ratio to be in similar ranges as that of observations.
Keywords :
Carbon bond mechanism , Photochemical assessment monitoring stations , CMAQ , VOC , Model performance , Non-methane organic compounds , ozone
Journal title :
Atmospheric Environment
Journal title :
Atmospheric Environment